Some frequent examples of headcanon include relationships between characters, abilities, events following the conclusion of the work, etc. which the author or creator has not explained or included. For example, a consumer may "read between the lines" and assume that there was a previous romantic relationship between two characters where no conclusive evidence actually exists of one. Some fans who come up with particularly interesting or convincing headcanons may decide to share them with others in hopes that their idea spreads. Faith and belief are or should be flexible in at least some respects, and there are gaps that need filling, particularly in the case of traditions whose historical practices are missing or have been destroyed. Which, when you think about it, are all kinda the same thing.

I want to SERIOUSLY emphasize this because the moderators take this EXTREMELY seriously. While they aren't puritans, they aren't going to look kindly on open breaches of the ToS violation in public spaces and might even consider action on actions taken in private while in game. Even if your character description links to an external site, moderators might very well be willing to take that into consideration based on what they are investigating. Remember, no matter how old the game might be, we should respect that kids might be playing.

COULD he have tried squishing Kai or Arte like bugs? So it was never tossed on the proverbial table as an option. My headcanon generator is always very self-contained as well. The characters in my Paragon PD SG have met Blue Steel, but he doesn't look up to them or owe my characters any favors.

There's a very limited amount we could say about them based on our current understanding. A better example would probably be quantum computing. But as I said, that section was VERY opinion based.

Plenty of Dark Horse Star Wars in here (the whole Tales of the Jedi arc!), not to mention the Indiana Jones comicsand, of course, Iron Man. We are not official in any shape or form, nor affiliated, sponsored, or otherwise endorsed by Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK, or TPCi. When a cute fandom blog you follow randomly reblogs the worse political take you’ve ever seen, and you have to decide whether or not to unfollow them. Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. • Speaking of Niccolo and Sasha, had Sasha not died, they would've eventually been in a relationship because they saw no flaws in each other since day one and Niccolo was one of the quickest to put aside the Eldian and Marleyan bias. • Because this is pretty much canon anyway, Armin has anxiety.

Special magic substance that only your character uses? Other people probably shouldn’t step on your ideas, because they don’t know how everything about your character interlaces. That reaction to a family member may have driven an important personality trait, and if they say"they don’t act like that to them! " then it could destroy the entire character if you hinge on that feeling. Especially if it’s something that could be read ambiguously, which means they can shove it in their pie hole in the most courteous way of saying so. Another advantage of character headcanon generators is their ability to foster community and collaboration.

Istarted with Iron Man in the Heroes Reborn era. Andin spite of confusionabout pocket universes I followed Iron Man back from Heroes Reborn into mainstreamMarvel. I think this is an importantsubject to take notice of because it shows how the lines between how magic isportrayed in media and how magic is enacted in the real world continue to blur. These productions have made fictional characters out of religious figures such as the archangel Gabriel or the god Odin. So the question is, when I decide that I agree that the demon Crowley from Good Omens is most definitely the Archangel Raphael, only fallen, that’s definitely fanon, right?

That in the EU there really wasn’t any organization to the canon, that they just release stuff and the fans decide what fits and what doesn't, so everyone has a different interpretation to what is and isn’t canon? Again, you are inadvertently driving them to the wrong conclusions and once again losing the argument without even meaning to. ("Superman? Oh that cheap Statesman rip-off.") I don't see why fictional accounts of fictional superheroes wouldn't exist in CoH.

What’s more, they are all easily recognizable and their involvement in any story can make it stand out. It’s all fun and games until Arbiter Daos asks to see you. But there is something that should be avoided heavily and that’s integrating an NPC into your character’s story in such a way that they had an active role in your character’s life if not still do. No, I don’t mean metaphorically, I mean everything.

If you do change a character, make sure you explain that this is a legitimate difference and not a mistake so people don’t try to helpfully correct you for the rest of your life. People like helping, especially when they love your character and want to make sure you know absolutely everything about them to make it as realistic as possible. Throughout the 2000s, particularly from the 2020s onwards, some fans noticed an increase in people using (insert term)-coded with greater frequency, sometimes as a means of implying a greater canonical validity than just a headcanon generator ship[1]. For example, instead of fans headcanoning a character as autistic, they were autistic-coded, and instead of a character being head-canoned as queer, they were queer-coded. In terms of a given literary series, "canon" describes a set of works that are collectively recognized by the community as having authenticity.