It almost pains me to know that teachers around the world are reading essays written by ChatGPT with little oversight. An AI detector like our tool Winston AI uses AI that trains on a large dataset to learn the patterns of AI writing vs human writing. AI detection tools need to be kept up to date as AI tools are developing quickly. While sometimes SafeAssign can detect content generated by ChatGPT or other AI language models, its effectiveness may vary. There are ongoing discussions and concerns about the limitations of SafeAssign in detecting AI-generated texts.
Given that ChatGPT generates fundamentally unique text, it’s challenging for SafeAssign to detect it. It looks for exact matches or very close similarities to flag content as potentially plagiarized. By understanding and simulating human-like text patterns, ChatGPT can generate text on a wide array of topics with surprising depth and accuracy. Some people might use it to quickly create information for their school work or paraphrase their sentences to sound better. Every time I submit a paper through this system, I’m teaching myself to be more original and careful with sources. The tool accurately identified six out of 16 AI-generated texts but failed to identify three more.
AI has recently opened up numerous possibilities in the academic domain, transforming the educational landscape through various applications, such as NLP and autonomous systems (Norvig 2021). AI has been employed in education to create personalized student learning experiences, leveraging NLP and machine learning algorithms (Chen et al., 2012). The advent of AI-based tutoring systems has contributed to increasingly interactive and engaging student learning environments (Sapci Sapci 2020). Furthermore, AI-based platforms have maintained academic integrity by detecting plagiarism and providing personalized feedback (Hinojo-Lucena et al. 2019). However, AI also poses potential risks related to cheating and plagiarism, with severe academic and legal consequences (Foltýnek et al. 2019).
He recommends integrating critical thinking exercises that make it harder for students to rely on AI alone. Currently, Turnitin can detect GPT-3, GOT-3.5, and GPT-4 Chat model languages. Thanks to a perfectly designed machine model that scans small texts first to understand the context and then checks each sentence with a score of 0 to 1. Therefore, Turnitin can know whether the text is due to human-made or written by AI. To give an exact percentage, Turnitin calculates the average of the scores from the segmented parts and converts this into a percentage. You can safeguard your own work by submitting copies of your papers to the Global Reference Database.
Honorlock is proctoring software that runs on Google’s Chrome Extension. Honorlock allows for manual proctoring, in which an Honorlock representative oversees the students’ exam. Robert Obemeier, Learning Analyst for MercerOnline, presented a variety of academic scenarios in which AI could be used as a tool to practice skills or generate study methods. "Why would a student plagiarize so soon and so early in a class, and especially on an assignment that if you wrote three sentences, you would’ve gotten a hundred?
does safeassign detect chatgpt works by comparing a student’s text against a vast database of academic papers, websites, and other relevant resources. It’s important to recognize these changes and proactively seek solutions for accurate plagiarism detection and prevention. Staying updated on emerging technologies like AI in academia can help us navigate potential pitfalls and maintain academic integrity within our content. Yes, Turnitin can detect AI content generated by other language models and tools in the market.
SafeAssign mainly looks at how much student work matches texts from the internet, past submissions, and academic papers. SafeAssign scans billions of internet pages, millions of academic essays, and student papers already submitted. To be fair, I didn't set out to check plagiarism checkers in this article. But since I'm using source material I know I pulled from my existing article, I figured the plagiarism checker would have slammed all of them as 100% plagiarized. In any case, Originality.ai did well on the part we set out to test, the AI checker. While the overall results have improved dramatically, I would not be comfortable relying solely on these tools to validate a student's content.
