The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gaming.

No, they weren't personally in attendance, however the world-famous celebs were conspicuously consisted of in a slide discussion on social and sweepstakes gambling establishments - the controversial sites offering both free casino-style video games and rewarding prizes, such as cash, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anyone can 'bet free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar market that now finds itself besieged by claims. In the eyes of many video gaming corporations, not to point out claim plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos serve as standard casinos, only without the oversight, customer defenses and tax laws. So not only can they avoid the high 24-percent federal gambling levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't subject to regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming defenses.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in income last year alone. Now the business faces accusations of unlawful gambling in a New york city claim that claims VGW utilizes star endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its item. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm not exactly sure" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business running multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of stars from gambling enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any distinctions in between standard sports betting and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among numerous sweepstakes gambling establishments discovered online

Ryan Seacrest urges fans to play at Chumba Casino, where many - however not all - games are totally free

Drake has a deal with social sweeps casino, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media

Learn more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements normally focus around the social element of the gambling establishments, while omitting the capacity for actual sports betting losses.

Others lure consumers with guarantees of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social media ad displaying Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and estates before rotating to video footage of the rap artist playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' read the first caption on the screen.

Another caption discussed: 'Because I never ever offered up.'

The discrepancy between sports betting websites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the former.

A spokesperson for an industry trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), described its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA data, many of the players on social-sweepstakes gambling establishments are playing for totally free.

'Most social sweeps customers never purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller than the typical deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming sites.'

Social casinos offer customers an opportunity to play casino-style games with friends. Players have the alternative to buy worthless currency typically described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, however can be used to unlock various functions within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, enabling clients to obtain other currency referred to as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for monetary losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes gambling establishments in the past year after continuing to purchase more coins in pursuit of money and other things of worth.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting an International Poker occasion

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an ad revealing off Drake's cars and trucks, airplanes and mansions

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but seven states, which has actually helped to sustain the appeal of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which do not require generally need identification. However, sites like Chumba will request for IDs from players attempting to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit clients to send mail-in demands for free sweeps coins, supplied the players follow painfully specific guidelines. What's more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins merely for registering, consequently providing them a factor to try their hands at any number of gambling establishment games for a possibility to win - or lose - real money.

So why are sweepstakes websites enabled to run in 48 states, while online casinos are prohibited in all however 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the complimentary casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is merely a means of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes video games are just a form of online home entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by e-mail. 'No purchase is needed to play at social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever need to pay for a chance to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is an essential distinction in between social sweeps and standard online gaming websites like gambling establishments.'

Consider the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that offer them the opportunity to win lucrative prizes, such as a $1 million jackpot.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the video game itself doesn't satisfy the meaning of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring approach for promoting all type of daily services in the United States, whatever from hamburgers to publication memberships to coffee and home enhancement shops,' the SPGA representative told DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promos are frequently used by a who's who of household names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous gambling market experts, that argument doesn't cut it.

For beginners, gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly video game does not run indefinitely. Rather, it has a distinct start and end, consequently recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's primary item. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote real items like french fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last permanently and they're generally not connected to casino-style games of opportunity,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're simply money giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the attributes typically related to McDonald's-design sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in perpetuity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments offer" casino-like" payouts, normally 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the normal payment percentage for a momentary advertising sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the profits made by the business [normally less than one percent]'

Wallach is fast to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the web coffee shops that emerged in Florida, using customers the chance to play casino-style video games for genuine prizes. A number of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually given that been shuttered over claims of unlawful gaming.

DJ Khaled is amongst numerous star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps casinos should deal with comparable analysis.

'These differences are not arbitrary,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually consistently been cited by courts and state attorney generals as key aspects in figuring out that a sweepstakes promo remained in fact a guise for illegal gambling.'

One of the gambling establishment industry's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing lawmakers to investigate sweepstakes operators and, in some cases, enact brand-new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being denied of protections and states are passing up substantial tax and revenue chances as this gaming changes that performed through regulated channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have actually sued social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four different cases in Kentucky without confessing any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action lawsuit, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal expenses and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has actually signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the current suit, which is mainly similar to its predecessors, New York state citizens Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is described in the filing as an 'prohibited gaming enterprise. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been called as offenders in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for remark.

'We normally do not talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com through e-mail. 'However, we note that this claim has only simply been submitted with the court and VGW has not been officially served.

'We have complete confidence in our compliance with all laws and guidelines where we operate, and stay confident about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play games throughout most of North America, as we have for more than a years, creating not only great games, user experiences and entertainment, but also ensuring this is done safely, responsibly and at the highest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other lawsuits and arbitrations are fairly typical throughout the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we mean to vigorously safeguard any claim which may be brought versus us.'

The problems between conventional online gaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments could prove troublesome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with traditional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking unlawful sports betting wagering 'sweeps' websites while at the exact same time the leagues desire to forecast a strong position against unlawful gambling - specifically when attempting to tamp down the periodic gambling scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was just 8 months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time restriction from the NBA over claims he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Together with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably illegal gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes casinos as a major concern for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd expect that a league crackdown on athletes endorsing sweepstakes websites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA representative nor the players' representatives reacted to DailyMail.com's demands for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise disregarded to react to DailyMail.com e-mails.

Asked if their star endorsers have a duty to discuss to clients the distinctions and similarities between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,' the representative said. 'Some of our values are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who lend their names to shady illegal sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their track records at risk as well as courting civil and class actions by customers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some threat that state regulators and state attorneys basic rope celeb endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with prohibited sports betting.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton